Better Coaches=Better Players
ft. Kyle LaCroix
Kyle LaCroix, an RSPA Master Professional and founder of SETS (Specialized Educational Tennis Solutions), joins Lisa Stone for a wide-ranging conversation about the state of tennis coaching in America.
Better Coaches = Better Players — ft. Kyle LaCroix
Summary
Kyle LaCroix, an RSPA Master Professional and founder of SETS (Specialized Educational Tennis Solutions), joins Lisa Stone for a wide-ranging conversation about the state of tennis coaching in America. LaCroix argues that the coaching industry is dangerously unregulated — it takes more training hours to make a donut at Dunkin’ Donuts than to become a tennis coach — and that this lack of standards harms player development and drives families away from the sport. He advocates for better coach education, parent inclusion in the coach-player triangle, and systemic reform through organizations like RSPA and the new USTA Coaching initiative.
Guest Background
- RSPA Master Professional (one of approximately 200 worldwide)
- Certified by RSPA, PTR, and GPTCA
- MBA from University of Michigan; Master’s from Stanford University
- Graduate of Ferris State University’s Professional Tennis Management (PTM) program
- Former head tennis professional at a private club in Boca Raton, FL for 19+ years
- Former competitive junior from Tampa Bay area; lost love-and-love to David Nalbandian at age 17
- Founder of SETS, which invests in coaching professionals’ education, certification, and career advancement
- Married to Lisa LaCroix (former ParentingAces guest), a speech pathologist and 501(c)(3) CEO
Key Topics
-
The unregulated coaching industry: No barrier to entry for tennis coaches; anyone with a phone and a basket of balls can call themselves a coach. Contrast with professions requiring continuing education (doctors, lawyers, speech pathologists).
-
Coach education gaps: Major coaching organizations historically have not tested coaches on junior pathways, college recruiting, USTA competitive structure, ITF circuits, or rating/ranking systems — the exact things tennis parents need help with.
-
The parent-coach-player triangle: Parents should not be sidelined as check-writers. LaCroix advocates for a one-page responsibility document (coach responsibilities, player responsibilities, parent responsibilities) given to every new family.
-
PTM programs as a pipeline: Professional Tennis Management programs at Ferris State, Methodist, and others accelerate coaching careers but remain largely unknown. LaCroix wishes US Open honey deuce profits funded PTM advertising.
-
Club vs. academy coaching: Two distinct professional tracks with different business models, skill sets, and cultures. Club pros are essentially CEOs running a racket sports department; academy coaches focus on player performance.
-
Coaching with empathy: The best coaches implant ideas in players’ heads and make them believe it was their own idea. LaCroix requires his coach-development students to play with their opposite hand to experience the learner’s frustration.
-
Why juniors quit: “I’ve never met a player that quit tennis because they don’t like tennis. They quit because they don’t like the experience.”
-
Training vs. enjoyment: Training is meant for improvement, not enjoyment. Mental health damage comes more from quitting a dream than from the rigor of pursuing it.
Actionable Advice for Families
- Demand a one-page expectations document from your child’s coach outlining responsibilities and accountability for coach, player, and parent.
- Research coaches thoroughly: Ask questions of current families, and especially ask families who left — why did they leave?
- Understand the difference between a coach and a hitter, between education and exercise and enjoyment (the three E’s).
- Support coaching education initiatives — better-educated coaches produce better outcomes for everyone.
- Recognize that communication is the foundation: Parents and coaches must have transparent, ongoing dialogue. If a coach acts as a gatekeeper of information, that is a red flag.
- Empower your child early: Have them take ownership of small responsibilities (stringing rackets, communicating with pro shop) to build self-reliance.
INTENNSE Relevance
- Coach education reform aligns with INTENNSE’s positioning around improving the junior tennis ecosystem. LaCroix’s one-page responsibility framework is a simple, implementable tool INTENNSE could promote or template.
- USTA Coaching is called out as a hot-button topic but ultimately a positive step — relevant to INTENNSE’s relationship with USTA and monitoring of industry reform.
- The PTM pipeline represents an underserved awareness gap. INTENNSE could surface PTM programs as a career pathway for junior players who love tennis but won’t go pro.
- LaCroix’s SETS model (investing in coaches’ education and career development) is a potential partner or reference for INTENNSE’s consulting frameworks.
- The “better coaches = better players” thesis directly supports INTENNSE’s evidence base for why coaching quality is a critical variable in player development outcomes.
Notable Quotes
“It takes more education hours to make a donut than it does to become a tennis coach.”
“I’ve never met a player or even a junior that quit tennis because they don’t like tennis. I’ve met a lot of juniors that quit because they don’t like the experience.”
“Any great coach — the real secret that makes them truly great isn’t their knowledge, it’s not their passion, it’s not the motivation. It’s that they are able to take an idea or a concept and implant it in the player’s head and make the player believe that it’s their idea.”